Welcome to Charleston Real Estate Blog Sign in | Help

Charleston home price appreciation by zip code 2000 - 2006

The Charleston South Carolina real estate market has grown significantly in the number of sales and the average selling price between 2000 and 2006. As an overall market, unit sales climbed by 61.7% from the year 2000 to 2006 (and while 2006 was a pretty good year for real estate sales in the Charleston area, it was not as strong as 2005). Price appreciation was also very strong throughout the Charleston area with homes appreciating at rates from 50% to over 160% during the six year period. While appreciation rates might pale compared to some of the really hot housing markets in other parts of the country, the Charleston South Carolina real estate market is not suffering quite as badly as some of those previous hot markets.

 

zipareasales 00sales 06% changeavg 00avg 06% change
29401Downtown lower151126-16.56%$709,389$1,400,91897.48%
29403Downtown upper14320946.15%$148,427$363,533144.92%
29405N Charleston15928277.36%$67,574$132,91196.69%
29406N Chas/Hanahan255589130.98%$103,207$180,62475.01%
29407West Ashley37742613.00%$161,298$288,78879.04%
29412James Island51557812.23%$182,137$325,72978.84%
29414West Ashley48361928.16%$161,196$261,03961.94%
29418N Charleston309288-6.80%$111,977$182,24062.75%
29420N Charleston29438631.29%$145,336$257,10076.90%
29439Folly Beach5345-15.09%$381,467$944,279147.54%
29445Goose Creek824131759.83%$120,812$187,83755.48%
29451Isle of Palms193161-16.58%$624,359$1,363,518118.39%
29455Johns Island *22836861.40%$455,119$583,96328.31%
29456Ladson303644112.54%$93,592$171,87883.65%
29461Moncks Corner147407176.87%$106,846$196,42983.84%
29464Mount Pleasant798637-20.18%$242,863$539,105121.98%
29466Mount Pleasant37371090.35%$248,085$477,20192.35%
29482Sullivan's Island293727.59%$798,909$2,095,182162.26%
29483Summerville7031614129.59%$120,210$194,08161.45%
29485Summerville5211582203.65%$147,577$221,97350.41%
29492Daniel Island111244119.82%$311,032$720,092131.52%

The above chart shows the number of sales in 2000 and 2006 for single family homes by zip code throughout the Charleston area. Please note that Johns Island * reflects not only Johns Island but Kiawah and Seabrook Islands which share the same zip code.

A couple of noteworthy points as I look at the data. There has been tremendous growth in the North area of Charleston with Summerville, Goose Creek, Moncks Corner, Ladson, and parts of North Charleston showing high levels of unit sales activity. The most logical reason for this is simply affordability. While price appreciation has been strong, the North area continues to remains very affordable.

Mount Pleasant also enjoyed significant growth in sales in the area beyond Highway 41 and price appreciation was robust throughout the town. Part of that was due to restrictions the Town of Mount Pleasant enacted to limit growth and demand far exceeded supply and with a limited number of building permits, builders used them to build bigger and more expensive homes.

Prices in downtown and at the beaches have soared and the luxury housing market in the Charleston area continues to look especially robust. Daniel Island has done spectacularly well in both sales and appreciation during the past decade.

I have not included any statistics on townhomes and condominiums since that market was insignificant in 2000 and the data would be misleading especially with the glut of inventory in the townhome and condo market. Additionally, I omitted zip codes with small populations and limited activity focusing on only the most popular areas.     

Published Tuesday, September 04, 2007 9:06 AM by Howard Arnoff

Comments

# re: Charleston home price appreciation by zip code 2000 - 2006

Thanks for this table and comments, Howard. Interesting stuff.

Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:06 PM by Kip

# re: Charleston home price appreciation by zip code 2000 - 2006

Kip, glad you stopped by and liked the statistics. I hope all is well and say hi to Julie and Alice.

Thursday, September 06, 2007 12:27 PM by Howard Arnoff
New Comments to this post are disabled